Why Fact-Checking Matters

Fact Check – road sign concept

I recently heard a historical quote preached in a sermon by from what I assume is a well-intentioned man. The quote was claimed to be from a third century bishop named Cyprian of Carthage:

"Oh, how wonderfully Providence arranged that on the day the sun was born, Christ should be born."

It was then claimed that the date of December 25 was clearly stolen from paganism, and that a Christian in good conscience shouldn’t celebrate on this day. After all, “a third century bishop was actively aligning Sol Invictus’s[1] birth with Jesus’ birth.” Therefore, we must “accept the possibility that early Christians borrowed that date.”

* * * * *

Every day on social media, we are presented with “facts” and “quotes” and “evidence” designed to shape our thoughts and behavior. Sometimes those “facts,” “quotes,” and “evidence” align with our preconceived ideas (Did you hear, AOC ate a baby), and we accept them without question. Other times they challenge our beliefs—we usually ignore those ones.

But rather than blindly accept or blindly ignore these things, we should instead think critically about these claims.

I am admittedly a lover of Christmas. While I acknowledge that Jesus probably wasn’t born on December 25 (though there’s a 0.274% chance He was), I think it’s a good thing for two billion Christians to take over the world every December and proclaim the good news of Jesus.

But when I heard the above quote, my first thought wasn’t “There’s NO WAY that’s true—after all, it challenges my worldview. How could that possibly be right?” I also didn’t think, “Well, that’s unfortunately, let’s make sure we suppress that in our memory, so we don’t feel convicted next December 1.” Instead, I decided to take five minutes to verify the claim.

The first issue I noticed was the timing. December 25 was calculated as the birthdate of Jesus by Hippolytus in 204 AD—a full seventy years before the Birthday of Sol Invictus in 274 AD.[2] So regardless of whether Cyprian really made this statement, the timing didn’t fit.

That bagged the question: Did Cyprian actually make this statement? I looked it up, and Cyprian died in 258 AD—sixteen years before Sol Invictus’ feast day was instituted. How could Cyprian have possibly referenced “the day the sun was born” if that holiday didn’t yet exist? I dug a little deeper, and sure enough, Cyprian never made this quote. Historians have universally agreed that this statement was made by some anonymous writer and then falsely attributed to Cyprian.

After only a few minutes’ research, I had discovered that this quote wasn’t actually made by a third century bishop, that it was supposedly made decades before the Feast of Sol Invictus was invented, and that—even were it a genuine quote—it could only possibly demonstrate that Sol Invictus had borrowed from Christmas, not the other way around.

But now I was on a roll, so I kept on going.

I decided to look up the original quote to understand the full context. The letter was called Computus de Pascha (On the Computing of Passover), attributed to Pseudo-Cyprian. Unfortunately, it has never been fully translated into English—so I had to rely on the original Latin (found here).

In Latin, the text reads,

O quam praeclara et divina Domini providentia! ut in illo die quo factus est sol, in ipso die nasceretur Christus, V kl. apr. feria IV, Et ideo de ipso merito ad plebem dicebat Malachias propheta: ‘Orietur vobis sol justitiae, et curatio est in pennis ejus.’”

In English,

Oh, how glorious and divine providence of the Lord! that on that day on which the sun was made, on that very day Christ would be born, 5 kl. Apr. feria IV, And therefore of that merit the prophet Malachi said to the people: ‘The Sun of justice shall arise for you, and healing is in His wings.’”

I immediately noticed a few differences between the quote as presented and the actual translation. First, it doesn’t reference “the day the sun was born,” but rather “that day on which the sun was made.” Even looking at the Latin phrasing, the word describing the inception of the sun is factus, meaning “to create” or “to make.” This is different from the word describing the day Jesus was “born”—nasceretur. This quote isn’t referring to the “birthday” of the sun but the “creation day” of the sun, with the originator of the quote intentionally changing the word.

Next I noticed a jumble of abbreviations and numbers—”5 kl. Apr. feria IV.” This was a calendar date. Pseudo-Cyprian didn’t just say that the creation day of the sun was the same day Christ was born—he gave us the exact date! And what was that date?

“5 kl. Apr. feria IV.” Five days before the Kalends of April, Weekday Four. Wednesday, March 28.

Not only was Pseudo-Cyprian not claiming that Jesus was born on Sol Invictus’ birthday—he was claiming He was born in March, months after December 25!

So if Pseudo-Cyprian thought Jesus was born in March, why did he make the connection to Sol Invictus? He didn’t! As we already mentioned, there was no celebrated birthday to Sol Invictus yet. So what was Pseudo-Cyprian referring to?

Exactly what he told us: the creation of the sun.

Third century Christians believed that Jesus had been crucified on March 25—their estimation of the Passover. Well, they believed that if new life for the Israelites occurred on Passover and if new life for Christians occurred on Passover, then new life for planet earth must’ve also occurred on Passover. So they dated the creation of the universe to Passover—March 25.

And in Genesis 1, we read that the sun was made on the fourth day of creation. So if March 25 was Day 1, March 28 would have been Day 4—the day on which the sun was made. Pseudo-Cyprian then concludes by quoting from the prophet Malachi: “The Sun of justice shall arise for you, and healing is in His wings.”

 Cyprian never claimed any connection between Christmas and Sol Invictus. Cyprian didn’t even author this letter. And the claim was that Jesus was born in the spring, on the same day the sun was created by God.

* * * * *

This post isn’t about Christmas. Like I said, the date ultimately doesn’t matter. This post is about liars bent on deceiving you.

The originator of this quote knew the truth. He knew it wasn’t talking about Sol Invictus—that’s why he took the liberty to change the word “created” to “born.” He also knew it wasn’t talking about December 25—the original quote was cut off mid-sentence to hide the fact that it was talking about March 28. A deceitful man decided to fabricate a quote, cut out relevant information, and change words to make it sound like a holiday celebrated by billions of Christians was secretly a pagan ritual.

And tons of people fell for it.

The man who sent me the quote probably didn’t know any better. But it aligned with a supposed “truth” he wanted to believe in—namely, that much of Christianity is pagan in origin—and so rather than spend five minutes to fact-check his source, a congregation was taught a convenient lie that reinforced a lie they all wanted to hear.

It’d be easy to point fingers at this congregation for believing their desired lie. But every day I see the same thing on facebook and twitter. People who hate Trump spreading lies to reinforce their hatred of Trump. People who love Trump spreading lies to reinforce their love of Trump. Things that are so obviously not true that anyone with a brain should be able to see through it—but they don’t, they can’t, they won’t.

So next time you see something on the internet, before you retweet it or share it or declare it to an entire church, take a few minutes and verify that it’s true. We are the people of the truth, after all.  


[1] Sol Invictus was the Roman god of the sun, whose feast day was instituted on December 25 in the year 274 AD.

[2] Additionally, the Birthday of Sol Invictus isn’t actually attested to in history until 354 AD—a full 150 years after Hippolytus’ calculation.

When Was Jesus Actually Born?

Christmas is closing in, which means that families around the world are gearing up to celebrate the birth of Jesus. But when exactly was Jesus born?

Short answer: The Bible doesn’t tell us. God, in His infinite wisdom, didn’t find it needful to relay the exact date of Jesus’ birth to His faithful followers.

That said, it’s fun to travel down the rabbit hole and guess when it could have been. I will present a few theories, but it’s important to note that every day is a great day to celebrate the incarnation of Jesus, and no one can confirm with confidence when the nativity actually occurred.

Theory 1: November 13 (Earliest Proposed Date)

The earliest attempt to calculate the birth of Jesus comes from Clement of Alexandria’s 200 AD work Stromata:

From the birth of Christ, therefore, to the death of Commodus are, in all, a hundred and ninety-four years, one month, thirteen days.” (Stromata, Book 1, Chapter 21)

Given that Commodus died on December 31, 192 AD, we can calculate the birth of Jesus according to Clement: November 18, 3 BC.

In this same document, however, Clement notes that there are many who disagree with him:

There are those who have determined not only the year of our Lord’s birth, but also the day. And they say that it took place in the twenty-eighth year of Augustus, and in the twenty-five day of Pachon [May 20, 3 BC]…Others say that He was born on the twenty-fourth or twenty-fifth of Pharmuthi [April 19-20].”

It is unclear how these three dates were derived. And ultimately, none of these dates caught on, but all three would have been proposed early in Christian history.

Theory 2: December 25

Hippolytus of Rome was the first to suggest that Jesus was born on December 25. In his Commentary on Daniel in 204 AD, he wrote:

For the first advent of our Lord in the flesh, when He was born in Bethlehem, was eight days before the Kalends of January [i.e., December 25], the fourth day [Wednesday], while Augustus was in his forty-second year… He suffered in the thirty-third year, eight days before the Kalends of March [March 25], the day of preparation, the eighteenth year of Tiberius Caesar.” (Commentary on Daniel, Book 4, Chapter 23.3)

The date of December 25 was chosen based on a Jewish tradition that righteous men entered the world and died on the same day:

The Holy One, blessed is He, sits and fills the years of the righteous from day to day and from month to month, as it is written, ‘The number of your days I will fulfill’ (Exodus 23:26).” (Rosh Hashanah 11a)

Building from this tradition, it was reasoned that Jesus’ conception and death happened on the same day:

For He is believed to have been conceived on the 25th of March, upon which day also He suffered; so the womb of the Virgin, in which He was conceived, where no one of mortals was begotten, corresponds to the new grave in which He was buried, wherein was never man laid, neither before nor since. But He was born, according to tradition, upon December 25th.” (De Trinitate, Book IV, Chapter 5)

Thus, within a few centuries after the resurrection, December 25th was adopted as the traditional date of Jesus’ birth.

Theory 3: The Feast of Tabernacles (Tishri 15)

In recent years, another possibility has been conjectured—that Jesus was born during the autumn festival of Sukkot. This date makes much sense thematically. The Feast of Tabernacles (or Sukkot in Hebrew) celebrates God’s presence with mankind. Furthermore, the incarnation is described by John as a time when “the Word became flesh and tabernacled [Greek skenoo] among us” (John 1:14).

There is additional textual support. Luke’s gospel narrative uses parallel language to compare Zechariah and Elizabeth to Abraham and Sarah:

  • Both are described as προβεβηκότες ἡμέραις—“well advanced in years” (Luke 1:7, Genesis 18:11)
  • Sarah and Elizabeth are called στεῖρα—“barren” (Luke 1:7, Genesis 11:30)
  • Zechariah and Elizabeth are described as ἦσαν δὲ δίκαιοι ἀμφότεροι ἐνώπιον τοῦ θεοῦ πορευόμενοι ἐν πάσαις ταῖς ἐντολαῖς καὶ δικαιώμασιν τοῦ κυρίου ἄμεμπτοι—“they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless” (Luke 1:6). Just about every one of these words is lifted from the Abraham narrative (Genesis 15:6, 17:1, 24:40, Genesis 26:5).
  • Both couples were visited by an angel who spoke of a miracle birth (Luke 1:11, Genesis 18)

Luke seems to want his audience to associate the birth of John with the birth of Isaac. And given that Isaac was said to be born during “the time of life” (Hebrew אֵלֶ֨יךָ֙ כָּעֵ֣ת חַיָּ֔ה)—a possible reference to Passover according to Rabbinic tradition (Rosh Hashanah 11a, 500 AD)—it is thought that John was born during Passover as well. And if John was born at Passover, Jesus was born six months later—during the Festival of Tabernacles in the fall.

The Temple Service of the Division of Abijah

In 1583, a French scholar named Joseph Scaliger proposed a new methodology for dating the birth of Jesus—one that didn’t rely on theological arguments and tradition but upon mathematical calculations.

From oft-overlooked scriptures to the writings of Josephus and the Talmud, we can assemble a collection of clues that can arguably narrow down the date on which Jesus was born:

  • The Gospel of Luke tells us that Zechariah was a priest “of the division of Abijah” (Luke 1:5)
  • We read in the Hebrew Scriptures that Abijah was the eighth division to serve in the temple (1 Chronicles 24:10)
  • Zechariah lived in “the hill country of Judea” (Luke 1:39, 65)—somewhere between 4-20 miles from Jerusalem—indicating he would be able to arrive home on the same day he departed from the temple
  • Josephus writes that each division served for one week—“one course should minister to God eight days, from sabbath to sabbath” (Antiquities of the Jews, Book 7.14.7)
  • Josephus’ account lines up with the biblical testimony, suggests divisions began and ended their temple service on each Sabbath (2 Kings 11:5, 9; 2 Chronicles 23:8)
  • A later rabbinic tradition from the Mishnah writes that “at three times during the year, all priestly watches are equal,” meaning they all serve in the temple during the three festivals (Mishnah Sukkah 5, Sukkah 55b)
  • This same rabbinic tradition refers to “the priestly watch whose time is fixed,” indicating that each division served a “fixed” eight days (from Sabbath to Sabbath), uninterrupted by the arrival of additional divisions during the feasts
  • Jewish tradition states that the first division—Jehoiarib—was serving when the Temple was destroyed on Sunday, the 9th of Av in 70 AD (Taanit 29a, Jerusalem Talmud Taanit 4:5, Seder Olam Rabbah 30)

Using these datapoints assuming these later sources are accurate, it becomes possible to reconstruct when Zechariah would have been serving at the temple, giving us a few dates when he would have returned home to conceive a child with Elizabeth.

How the Biblical Calendar Functioned

The biblical year typically included twelve months, where each month was based upon the moon cycle and the first day of each month would begin at the first sight of the crescent moon. Since the moon cycle lasts 29.53 days, a biblical year would last between 354 and 355 days.

This falls about ten days short of a solar year (365.2425 days), meaning that—if left unchecked—each biblical year would begin ten days sooner than the previous year, and Passover (the spring feast) drift be celebrated in the dead of winter after only ten years. Thus a leap month was added about every three years to offset this drift, resulting in a thirteen-month year lasting 383 to 384 days.

The modern Jewish calendar was implemented in around 924 AD and attempts to mathematically replicate the ancient method by fixing month lengths and leap months to a repeating cycle rather than the movements of the moon and sun. The result is close to the original method by not precise—month lengths can range from 353-355 and 383-385 days, and a leap month is occasionally added to the wrong month (this is currently true—however, there is a slight drift, and thousands of years in the future the calendar will sometimes be off by months at a time).

For the purposes of our calculations, we will provide both the dates of the ancient biblical calendar and the modern Jewish calendar when they differ and notate this adjustment accordingly.

When Did the Division of Abijah Serve?

As stated above, the biblical account and historical records confirm that priests served in the temple in fixed eight-day watches (from Saturday to Saturday). These watches would not be interrupted by the festivals—rather additional priests would arrive to offer additional support during these times. This lack of interruptions is confirmed by the aforementioned timing of first division’s (Jehoiarib’s) service in 70 AD, which began on Shabbat (Saturday), Av 8, 70 AD (August 4)—the nineteenth week of the year. Since the year can be anywhere from 50 ½ weeks to 55 weeks (would doesn’t divide neatly into 24 divisions), this would result in a 2.5-7 week shift every week—e.g., if the tribe of Abijah began service on the 14th sabbath in one year, they might begin service on the 11th of the following year (or 7th during a leap year).

Using Av 9 (August 4), 70 AD as our anchor point, we can count backwards 24 weeks at a time to determine when each division would have been serving in the years leading up to Jesus’ birth. Most scholars agree that Jesus was born between 7 BC and 4 BC, so we will examine 8 BC to 3 BC as possible birthyears.

The table below shows the dates (both Julian, Ancient Biblical, and Modern Jewish) that the division of Abijah would have served, using an uninterrupted, shifting calendar:

Table 1: Abijah Service (Uninterrupted Shifting Calendar)

Division of Abijah Service BeginsDivision of Abijah Service Ends
Tammuz 24Jul. 13, 9 BCAv 2Jul. 20, 9 BC
Tebet 14Dec. 28, 9 BCTebet 21Jan. 4, 8 BC
Tammuz 6 (ancient) Sivan 5 (modern)Jun. 14, 8 BCTammuz 13 (ancient) Sivan 12 (modern)Jun. 21, 8 BC
Kislev 27 (ancient) Cheshvan 25 (modern)Nov. 29, 8 BCTebet 6 (ancient) Kislev 3 (modern)Dec. 6, 8 BC
Iyar 17May 16, 7 BCIyar 24May 23, 7 BC
Cheshvan 8Oct. 31, 7 BCCheshvan 15Nov. 7, 7 BC
Nisan 29Apr. 17, 6 BCIyar 6Apr. 24, 6 BC
Tishri 20Oct. 2, 6 BCTishri 27Oct. 9, 6 BC
Nisan 12 (ancient)
II Adar 10 (modern)
Mar. 19, 5 BCNisan 19 (ancient)
II Adar 17 (modern)
Mar. 26, 5 BC
Tishri 2 (ancient) Av 30 (modern)Sep. 2, 5 BCTishri 9 (ancient) Elul 7 (modern)Sep. 9, 5 BC
Shebet 20Feb 17, 4 BCShebet 27Feb. 24, 4 BC
Av 11Aug. 4, 4 BCAv 18Aug. 11, 4 BC
Shebet 3Jan. 19, 3 BCShebet 10Jan. 26, 3 BC
Tammuz 23Jul. 6, 3 BCAv 1Jul. 13, 3 BC
Tebet 14Dec. 21, 3 BCTebet 21Dec. 28, 3 BC

Alternatively, some have recently proposed the possibility that the first division would have always served during the first week of the year, the second division the second week, and so on. Proponents of this method also surmise that during the feasts—when all divisions were serving—the weekly rotation would have been pushed back. When one of the three major feasts rolled around, this service would be pushed back accordingly. If true, various divisions would have always served during the exact same time every year—e.g., the tenth division would always serve between days 73 and 79 of the calendar (Sivan 14 to Sivan 20), having started counting on Nisan 1 and pushing back eight days for Passover/Unleavened Bread and one day for Weeks.

There are a few issues with this methodology. For one, it doesn’t align with any part of the historical record. Additionally, 24 divisions each serving two week-long shifts plus an additional 17 days for the feasts falls 1-2 days short of the full year. Which division serves these additional few days? And in the event of a leap year, there could be as many as 32 extra days to make up. How are these additional days covered?

Adopting a possible “non-shifting” division cycle rejects the biblical account, historical records, and Jewish tradition, and creates more problems without bringing clarity. Regardless, we will include these non-shifting dates in our calculations to provide a thorough investigation of possible birthdates:

Table 2: Abijah Service (Non-Shifting Calendar)

Division of Abijah Service BeginsDivision of Abijah Service Ends
Iyar 27May 18, 9 BCSivan 4May 24, 9 BC
Cheshvan 28Nov. 12, 9 BCKislev 5Nov. 18, 9 BC
Iyar 27May 7, 8 BC (ancient) Jun. 7, 8 BC (modern)Sivan 4May 13, 8 BC (ancient) Jun. 13, 8 BC (modern)
Cheshvan 28Nov. 1, 8 BC (ancient) Dec. 2, 8 BC (modern)Kislev 5Nov. 7, 8 BC (ancient) Dec. 8, 8 BC (modern)
Iyar 27May 26, 7 BCSivan 4Jun. 1, 7 BC
Cheshvan 28Nov. 20, 7 BCKislev 5Nov. 26, 7 BC
Iyar 27May 15, 6 BCSivan 4May 21, 6 BC
Cheshvan 28Nov. 9, 6 BCKislev 5Nov. 15, 6 BC
Iyar 27May 3, 5 BC (ancient) Jun. 3, 5 BC (modern)Sivan 4May 9, 5 BC (ancient) Jun. 9, 5 BC (modern)
Cheshvan 28Oct. 28, 5 BC (ancient)
Nov. 28, 5 BC (modern)
Kislev 5Nov. 3, 5 BC (ancient) Dec. 4, 5 BC (modern)
Iyar 27May 24, 4 BCSivan 4May 30, 4 BC
Cheshvan 28Nov. 18, 4 BCKislev 5Nov. 24, 4 BC
Iyar 27May 12, 3 BCSivan 4May 18, 3 BC
Cheshvan 28Nov. 6, 3 BCKislev 5Nov.12, 3 BC

Finally, all divisions would have served during the three major feasts:

Table 3: Feast Service

 Service BeginsService Ends
PassoverNisan 14Apr. 5, 9 BCNisan 21Apr. 12, 9 BC
WeeksSivan 6May 26, 9 BCSivan 6May 26, 9 BC
TabernaclesTishri 15Sep. 30, 9 BCTishri 21Oct. 7, 9 BC
PassoverNisan 14Mar. 25, 8 BC (ancient)
Apr. 25, 8 BC (modern)
Nisan 21Apr. 1, 8 BC (ancient)
May 2, 8 BC (modern)
WeeksSivan 6May 15, 8 BC (ancient)
Jun. 15, 8 BC (modern)
Sivan 6May 15, 8 BC (ancient)
Jun. 15, 8 BC (modern)
TabernaclesTishri 15Sep. 19, 8 BC (ancient)
Oct. 20, 8 BC (modern)
Tishri 21Sep. 26, 8 BC (ancient)
Oct. 27, 8 BC (modern)
PassoverNisan 14Apr. 13, 7 BCNisan 21Apr. 20, 7 BC
WeeksSivan 6Jun. 3, 7 BCSivan 6Jun. 3, 7 BC
TabernaclesTishri 15Oct. 8, 7 BCTishri 21Oct. 15, 7 BC
PassoverNisan 14Apr. 2, 6 BCNisan 21Apr. 9, 6 BC
WeeksSivan 6May 23, 6 BCSivan 6May 23, 6 BC
TabernaclesTishri 15Sep. 27, 6 BCTishri 21Oct. 4, 6 BC
PassoverNisan 14Mar. 21, 5 BC (ancient)
Apr. 21, 5 BC (modern)
Nisan 21Mar. 28, 5 BC (ancient)
Apr. 28, 5 BC (modern)
WeeksSivan 6May 11, 5 BC (ancient)
Jun. 11, 5 BC (modern)
Sivan 6May 11, 5 BC (ancient)
Jun. 11, 5 BC (modern)
TabernaclesTishri 15Sep. 15, 5 BC (ancient)
Oct. 16, 5 BC (modern)
Tishri 21Sep. 22, 5 BC (ancient)
Oct. 23, 5 BC (modern)
PassoverNisan 14Apr. 11, 4 BCNisan 21Apr. 18, 4 BC
WeeksSivan 6Jun. 1, 4 BCSivan 6Jun. 1, 4 BC
TabernaclesTishri 15Oct. 6, 4 BCTishri 21Oct. 13, 4 BC
PassoverNisan 14Mar. 30, 3 BCNisan 21Apr. 6, 3 BC
WeeksSivan 6May 20, 3 BCSivan 6May 20, 3 BC
TabernaclesTishri 15Sep. 24, 3 BCTishri 21Oct. 1, 3 BC

Between these various methods, we arrive at roughly 36 dates from 9 BC to 3 BC for when Zechariah returned home (with an alternate 14 days if we substitute the historical method of uninterrupted, eight-day shifts with an assumed non-shifting calendar; and an alternate 14 days if we substitute the ancient biblical calendar with the modern Jewish calendar).

 Calculating Jesus’ Birth Date from Zechariah’s Service

It bears repeating that the gospel authors do not specify the date of Jesus’ birth. Thus, the text does not provide specific details that would allow us to pinpoint the exact moment of His birth. But in our recreational pursuit of this birthdate, we can utilize several clues to hone in on a possible solution.

John was conceived the day after Zechariah returned home

  • Luke’s gospel account tells us that Zechariah left the temple “as soon as the days of his service were completed” (Luke 1:23), and that “after those days his wife Elizabeth conceived” (v. 24).
  • Thus we can assume that John was conceived 1 day after Zechariah’s return, with a possible window of 1 to 7 days.

Mary conceived 5¾ months after Elizabeth conceived

  • We read that Elizabeth “hid herself five months” (Luke 1:24) after she conceived.
  • Furthermore, Mary was visited by the angel “in the sixth month” (vv. 26, 36) of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, indicating this took place between 5-6 months after Elizabeth’s conception.
  • After the angelic visitation, Mary arose “in those days and went into the hill country [of Judah] with haste” (v. 39), roughly a five-to-seven-day journey.
  • When Mary first arrived and greeted Elizabeth (v. 41), baby John leaped in the womb and Elizabeth declared, “Blessed is the fruit of your [Mary’s] womb” (v. 42), indicating May was already pregnant.
  • Mary remains with Elizabeth “about three months, and returned to her house” (v. 56) before the birth of John, again reinforcing that Mary arrived before a full six months of Elizabeth’s pregnancy.
  • Thus we can assume that Jesus was conceived 170 days after John (29.53-day month times 5¾ months), with a possible window of 162 to 177 days (5½ to 6 months).

Jesus was born full-term

  • Finally, Elizabeth’s pregnancy is recorded as being “full time” (v. 56) and Jesus was born when “the days were completed” (Luke 2:6), meaning both pregnancies were full-term.
  • This is confirmed by the timing related to Elizabeth’s pregnancy: 5.5 months at Mary’s conception, Mary’s 1-week trip to Judea, Mary’s 3-month stay, and Mary’s 1-week trip home is exactly nine months.
  • Thus we can assume that Mary was pregnant for 266 days (a full-term pregnancy), with a possible window of 259 to 273 days (one week early to one week late).

Based on these markers, Jesus was born 437 days after Zechariah returned home, with a possible window of 422 to 457 days (a two-week buffer before and a three-week buffer after). A range of 35 days (457 minus 422), applied to roughly 8 different possible starting points will admittedly cover most of the calendar. In fact, this allowable range will cover an average of seven months per calendar year. Below we will examine which of our theoretical dates (April 19-20, Mat 20, November 18, December 25, and Tishri 15) fit into this generous range of dates.

Table 4: Possible Dates of Jesus’ Birth (Feasts and Uninterrupted Shifting Calendar)

Date of BirthEarliest Date of BirthLatest Date of Birth
Tammuz 15Jun. 23, 8 BCSivan 30Jun. 8, 8 BCAv 6Jul. 13, 8 BC
Av 30Aug. 6, 8 BCAv 15Jul. 22, 8 BCElul 20Aug. 26, 8 BC
Tishri 26Sep. 30, 8 BCTishri 11Sep. 15, 8 BCCheshvan 16Oct. 20, 8 BC
Tebet 16Dec. 18, 8 BCTebet 1Dec. 3, 8 BCShevet 7Jan. 7, 7 BC
II Adar 16Mar. 17, 7 BCII Adar 1Mar. 2, 7 BCNisan 7Apr. 6, 7 BC
Sivan 15Jun. 12, 7 BCIyar 29May 28, 7 BCTammuz 5Jul. 2, 7 BC
Tammuz 29Jul. 26, 7 BCTammuz 14Jul. 11, 7 BCAv 20Aug. 15, 7 BC
Elul 7Sep. 1, 7 BCAv 22Aug. 17, 7 BCElul 27Sep. 21, 7 BC
Kislev 16Dec. 7, 7 BCKislev 1Nov. 22, 7 BCTebet 6Dec. 27, 7 BC
Shebet 28Feb. 16, 6 BCShebet 13Feb. 1, 6 BCAdar 18Mar. 8, 6 BC
Tammuz 15Jul. 1, 6 BCSivan 30Jun. 16, 6 BCAv 6Jul. 21, 6 BC
Av 19Aug. 3, 6 BCAv 4Jul. 19, 6 BCElul 9Aug. 23, 6 BC
Av 30Aug. 14, 6 BCAv 15Jul. 30, 6 BCElul 20Sep. 3, 6 BC
Tebet 15Dec. 26, 6 BCKislev 30Dec. 11, 6 BCShebet 16Jan. 15, 5 BC
Shebet 9Jan. 18, 5 BCKislev 23Jan. 3, 5 BCShebet 29Feb. 7, 5 BC
Tammuz 15Jun. 19, 5 BCSivan 30Jun. 4, 5 BCAv 6Jul. 9, 5 BC
Av 1Jul. 4, 5 BCTammuz 15Jun. 19, 5 BCAv 21Jul. 24, 5 BC
Av 30Aug. 2, 5 BCAv 15Jul. 18, 5 BCElul 20Aug. 22, 5 BC
Tebet 16Dec. 14, 5 BCTebet 1Nov. 29, 5 BCShevet 7Jan. 3, 4 BC
Tebet 21Dec. 19, 5 BCTebet 6Dec. 4, 5 BCShevet 12Jan. 8, 4 BC
Sivan 11Jun. 6, 4 BCIyar 25May 22, 4 BCTammuz 1Jun. 26, 4 BC
Sivan 13Jun. 8, 4 BCIyar 27May 24, 4 BCTammuz 3Jun. 28, 4 BC
Tammuz 27Jul. 22, 4 BCTammuz 12Jul. 7, 4 BCAv 18Aug. 11, 4 BC
Cheshvan 1Nov. 20, 4 BCCheshvan 15Nov. 5, 4 BCKislev 21Dec. 10, 4 BC
Kislev 14Dec. 3, 4 BCCheshvan 28Nov. 18, 4 BCTebet 5Dec. 23, 4 BC
Iyar 22May 7, 3 BCNisan 6Apr. 22, 3 BCSivan 13May 27, 3 BC
Tammuz 16Jun. 29, 3 BCTammuz 1Jun. 14, 3 BCAv 7Jul. 19, 3 BC
Elul 1Aug. 12, 3 BCAv 16Jul. 28, 3 BCElul 21Sep. 1, 3 BC
Cheshvan 13Oct. 22, 3 BCTishri 28Oct. 7, 3 BCKislev 4Nov. 11, 3 BC
Tebet 17Dec. 24, 3 BCTebet 2Dec. 9, 3 BCShebet 8Jan. 13, 2 BC
Nisan 4Apr. 8, 2 BCII Adar 18Mar. 24, 2 BCNisan 24Apr. 28, 2 BC
Sivan 15Jun. 17, 2 BCIyar 29Jun. 2, 2 BCTammuz 5Jul. 7, 2 BC
Tammuz 29Jul. 31, 2 BCTammuz 14Jul. 16, 2 BCAv 20Aug. 20, 2 BC
Elul 24Sep. 23, 2 BCElul 9Sep. 8, 2 BCTishri 15Oct. 13, 2 BC
Kislev 15Dec. 12, 2 BCCheshvan 30Nov. 27, 2 BCTebet 5Jan. 1, 1 BC
Adar 14Mar. 9, 1 BCShebet 29Feb. 23, 1 BCNisan 5Mar. 29, 1 BC

Between the years 8 BC and 3 BC, we find the following results:

Clement’s Estimation of November 18, 3 BC:

  • November 18, 3 BC does not fall within the 35-day window. Jesus’ birth would have to have happened 27 days after our predicted date.
  • However, November 18, 4 BC, is a plausible date, occurring only two days earlier than our predicted date of November 20, 4 BC (based on the division of Abijah’s rotational service ending on September 9/Tishri 9, 5 BC).

Clement’s Recording of May 20:

  • May 20, 3 BC is only 13 days after our predicted date of May 7, 3 BC (based on Abijah’s rotation service ending on February 24/I Adar 29, 4 BC), making it a possible date.

Clement’s Recording of April 19-20:

  • April 19-20 never fell within our window of possible dates.
  • The closest this date ever came was on April 20/Nisan 5, 3 BC, where it occurred 17 days before our predicted date (meaning Mary would have needed to deliver Jesus roughly 17 days earlier than expected).

Feast of Tabernacles:

  • The only year Tishri 15 fell within the plausible window was 8 BC. That year, the Feast of Tabernacles began on September 19, 8 BC, only 11 days before our predicted date of September 30 (based on Abijah’s rotational service ending on July 20/Tammuz 2, 9 BC). This eleven-day gap could be made up by some combination of Mary visiting Elizabeth earlier than assumed, Jesus being born a few days early, and Jesus’ birth occurring during the latter end of Tabernacles rather than on the first day.
  • It should be noted that most scholars place Jesus’ birth between 7 BC and 4 BC, making a birthdate of Tishri 15/September 19, 8 BC less plausible.
  • For the remaining five years (7 BC-3 BC), the closest that the Feast of Tabernacles comes to our 35-day window is 28 days early to 37 days late—and the 28-day date occurs in 3 BC, too late for Jesus’ birth, according to most scholars.

Christmas:

  • During the six years of 8 BC to 3 BC, December 25 fell within our 35-day window five times—twice within 1 day and an additional two years within 1 week.
  • Our predicted date of December 18, 8 BC is only seven days before Christmas. With this timing, Jesus’ conception would have occurred on Nisan 16/March 27—during the Feast of Passover.
  • Our predicted date of December 7, 7 BC is only 18 days before Christmas.
  • Our predicted date of December 26, 6 BC is only 1 day after Christmas—almost an exact match! Additionally, this dating would place Jesus’ conception on Nisan 16/April 4—during the Feast of Passover.
  • Our predicted date of December 19, 5 BC is only 6 days before Christmas. With this timing, Jesus’ conception would have occurred on Nisan 17/March 24—during the Feast of Passover.
  • Christmas Day in 4 BC (December 3) is our least likely date, falling 22 days early.
  • Our predicted date of December 24, 3 BC is only one day before Christmas—again, almost an exact match! Additionally, this dating would place Jesus’ conception on Nisan 17/April 2—during the Feast of Passover.

For the sake of thoroughness, we also examined the alternative dates for the division of Abijah, should we reject the testimony of 2 Chronicles, Josephus, and rabbinic tradition and create a non-shifting rotational cycle.

Table 5: Possible Dates of Jesus’ Birth (Non-Shifting Calendar)

Date of BirthEarliest Date of BirthLatest Date of Birth
Av 28Aug. 4, 8 BCAv 13Jul. 20, 8 BCElul 18Aug. 24, 8 BC
Shevet 29Jan. 29, 7 BCShevet 14Jan. 14, 7 BCI Adar 19Feb. 18, 7 BC
Tammuz 27Jul. 24, 7 BCTammuz 12Jul. 9, 7 BCAv 18Aug. 13, 7 BC
Tebet 28Jan. 18, 6 BCTebet 13Jan. 3, 6 BCShebet 19Feb. 7, 6 BC
Av 28Aug. 12, 6 BCAv 13Jul. 28, 6 BCElul 18Sep. 1, 6 BC
Shebet 28Feb. 6, 5 BCShebet 13Jan. 22, 5 BCAdar 18Feb. 26, 5 BC
Av 28Jul. 31, 5 BCAv 13Jul. 16, 5 BCElul 18Aug. 20, 5 BC
Shevet 29Jan. 25, 4 BCShevet 14Jan. 10, 4 BCI Adar 19Feb. 14, 4 BC
Tammuz 25Jul. 20, 4 BCTammuz 10Jul. 5, 4 BCAv 16Aug. 9, 4 BC
Tebet 27Jan. 14, 3 BCTebet 12Dec. 30, 4 BCShebet 18Feb. 3, 3 BC
Av 29Aug. 10, 3 BCAv 14Jul. 26, 3 BCElul 19Aug. 30, 3 BC
Shebet 30Feb. 4, 2 BCShebet 15Jan. 20, 2 BCI Adar 20Feb. 24, 2 BC
Tammuz 27Jul. 29, 2 BCTammuz 12Jul. 14, 2 BCAv 18Aug. 18, 2 BC
Tebet 27Jan. 23, 1 BCTebet 12Jan. 8, 1 BCShebet 18Feb. 12, 1 BC

The 35-day window based upon these new dates do not align with any of the aforementioned traditions:

  • Clement’s November 18 estimation never gets closer than 61 days early.
  • The May 20 and April 19-20 estimations are never closer than 61 days early and 73 days late, respectively.
  • Christmas is consistently 20 to 43 days before any of these dates.
  • The dates for the Feast of Tabernacles (Tishri 15) are always 45 to 78 days late, roughly 1½ and 2½ months.

Conclusion

Luke likely did not intend for his mention of Zechariah’s membership in the division of Abijah to be used to determine the date of Jesus’ birth—if Luke wanted us to know the exact date, he would have told us. Many assumptions need to be made in order to determine a plausible date from these details, and any unknown alteration to these patterns (e.g., what if the high priest postponed a division’s service dates, what if Passover were delayed for unexpected reasons one year, etc.) would render our calculations useless.

Having said that, if we appropriate the minor fact of Zechariah’s membership in the division of Abijah to deduce the dating of Jesus’ birth, most of Clement’s cited dates do not fit. May 20, 3 BC comes close to fitting, but most scholars agree Jesus would have been born between 7 BC and 4 BC, so this date is unlikely.

The dates of the Feast of Tabernacles also do not fit neatly into this pattern. September 19, 8 BC was the only one to match Abijah’s service, but this falls before the aforementioned 7 BC that most scholars agree upon. The remaining dates for Tabernacles fall between 4 and 5 weeks late. These could work if we assume that it took over a month for Elizabeth to conceive, but given the supernatural circumstances of her conception, this is also unlikely.

Surprisingly, Christmas is the best fit given the data. Four of the five years between 7 BC and 4 BC land near our calculated date—and three of those place Jesus’ conception at the same time as His eventual death, just as Hippolytus and Augustine surmised.

 When was Jesus actually born?

Thematically, the Feast of Tabernacles tells the best story. But if we use Luke’s casual reference to the division of Abijah, we find Christmas Day to be a stronger contender. And given several thousand years of historical precedent, it is a good thing to join with 2.3 billion Christians around the world during the Christmas season and rejoice in the birth of our Lord and Savior.

So declare Jesus’ incarnation every December. Declare it in the fall. Declare it in the spring and in the summer. Because Jesus—the perfect God-Man—is alive every day.

Jesus, the Maccabees, and Hanukkah

In the middle of the second century BC, things were not looking good for God’s people: They had been under Greco-Syrian occupation for over a hundred years; the priesthood had corrupted itself and was in the pocket of their pagan overlords; King Antiochus had demanded that the Jews stop serving Yahweh; and just about all of Israel decided to go along with it.

    Then on the 25th of Kislev in the year 167 BC, Antiochus declared that he was God, and marching into Jerusalem He set up the abomination of desolation—a pagan idol of Zeus—right in the middle of the temple.

    One family—led by Mattathias and his five sons Judah, Simon, John, Eleazar, and Jonathan—put a stop to this. They fled to the mountains, regrouped, and then began fighting. Not only did they stand against Antiochus and the Greeks—they stood against their kinsmen who had abandoned Yahweh in hopes of riches and political power.

    And after three years of fighting, on the 25th of Kislev in the year 164 BC (the day celebrated as Hanukkah—“Dedication”), they recaptured Jerusalem. They marched back into the temple, tore down every abomination that had been raised, and rededicated the temple and nation to the one true God. As the war continued, almost every member of the Maccabean family was killed in the war or assassinated—with the exception of John, who died of natural causes.

    And after seven years of war, the battle was won, the enemy was driven out, and the faithful remnant began rebuilding.

    Just under two hundred years later, we read a New Testament story about Hanukkah. On the 25th of Kislev, Jesus declared that He was God and marched into the temple (John 10:22-30). The Jews were outraged and tried to have Him killed (v. 31).

    So… what’s going on here?

    The Jews in the temple were acting like it was “167 BC” repeating itself. They acted like Jesus was a false king, a false god, an idol being set up in the temple. They acted like they were the Maccabees, fighting against Antiochus and the pagans.

    But that wasn’t what was actually happening, and they knew it.

    The Jews in the temple had already corrupted themselves years before. Under the occupation of Rome, the priesthood had abandoned God’s ways and partnered with the Romans in exchange for riches and power. They had steered the Jewish community away from God’s Word through their pagan traditions. They had desecrated the temple by exulting a false Yahweh made in their own image. In other words, the Jewish leaders weren’t the Maccabees—they were the paganized Jews who had sold out to Antiochus!

    And John 10 wasn’t repeating 167 BC—it was repeating 164 BC.

    After three years of ministry, Jesus and His disciples—half of whom were named after the Maccabees—had reached the temple on Hanukkah. They triumphantly marched in and declared Jesus was Yahweh—the one true God—tearing down the false caricature the rabbis had built up for all Israel to see.

    The story didn’t end there. The corrupt Jewish leaders doubled down on their alliance with Rome and spent the next forty years persecuting the followers of Jesus. Every disciple of Jesus was eventually murdered—with the exception of John, who died of natural causes.

    Eventually Rome turned on the leaders in Judea who had perverted God’s Word and led so many astray. After seven years of tribulation, those false leaders were slaughtered in 70 AD and Jerusalem was destroyed—an event Jesus described as another “abomination of desolation” in the temple.

    But just like the Maccabees, the faithful remnant survived. Heeding Jesus’ warning (Matthew 24:15-16), they had fled to the mountains—just like the Maccabees. And after the temple was destroyed and the corrupt leaders were defeated, they began rebuilding.

    Today there are 2.3 billion Christians around the world. We are here because two thousand years ago, a faithful remnant of Christ-followers refused to surrender. They refused to lose hope. Instead, in the spirit of the Maccabees they dedicated themselves to the Lord, fought for what was good and right and true, and committed their lives to rebuilding.

    And we have the same commission—to fight the good fight, to occupy until Jesus returns, to disciple all nations, and to take dominion over all the earth.

    Don’t lose hope. The battle is the Lord’s.

    Did Constantine Ruin Christianity?

    Is Christianity as we know it today an invention of Emperor Constantine and a perversion of the true faith handed down from Jesus to His disciples?

    In recent decades, many allegations have been leveled at the infamous emperor, including:

    • He handpicked which books would be included in the Bible
    • He invented the doctrine of Jesus’ divinity
    • He forced the Church to abandon their calendar
    • He enacted antisemitic laws that forced Jews away from Christianity

    Which of these accusations, if any, are true, and how did it shape the Christianity we practice today?

    Who Was Constantine?

    Constantine was a Roman emperor in the early fourth century. On October 27, 312 AD, he supposedly received a vision from the Christian God, who promised him victory in the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. Sure enough, his forces won the battle the following day.

    Constantine eventually converted to Christianity and legalized Christianity (and all other religions). And in 325 AD, he assembled the Council of Nicaea, which (among other things) declared Arianism a Christological heresy and announced that Christians would calculate the dates of Passover independently from the Jewish community.

    Did Constantine Create the Bible?

    No, Constantine did not have any impact on what books were included in the Bible.

    The twenty-seven books of the Old Testament were written prior to 400 BC and their canonicity was agreed upon hundreds of years before Constantine was born. Furthermore, the twenty-seven books of the New Testament were written and in circulation before the destruction of the temple in 70 AD—over two centuries before Constantine’s reign and the Council of Nicaea.

    A document called the Muratorian Fragment dates to around 175 AD (150 years before Constantine and Nicaea) and, while portions of the document are missing and difficult to translate, provides a list of New Testament books that were generally accepted and read in churches. This list largely coincides with the New Testament books we have today, and importantly doesn’t make any mention of the false gospels that are sometimes claimed to have been banned by Constantine.

    So, what did Constantine and the Council of Nicaea have to say about the canon of scripture? Nothing. This was not one of the topics of discussion at the Council, and there is no historical evidence that Constantine was involved in deciding which books should be included.

    Why, then, were some books (such as the Gospels of Thomas and Bartholomew) rejected? Because they were written long after the life of Jesus and the other New Testament writings, because they were falsely attributed to apostles who had long since died, and because they made fantastical claims at odds with the other New Testament writings[1] and contained obvious political messaging[2] that ran contrary to the rest of scripture.

    Did Constantine Invent Jesus’ Divinity?

    One reason Constantine called for the Council of Nicaea was to clarify Christian doctrine related to the divinity of Jesus. While this seems like an obviously biblical belief nowadays, in the fourth century a man named Arius was promoting the idea that Jesus was just a human, not God in the flesh.

    Did Constantine suppress Arius’ heart-felt belief and promote Jesus to the Godhead? No. In fact, Constantine actually leaned towards Arianism. The idea that a mere human could achieve god-like status (rather than the biblical doctrine that Jesus was and is eternally God) was much more attractive to Constantine’s Roman upbringing, so Constantine entered the Council of Nicaea supportive of Arius’ heresy.

    Over the course of the three-month council, hundreds of bishops (led by a man named Athanasius) bravely opposed Arius—and Constantine—to espouse the Bible’s teaching that Jesus was and had always been God. And rather than oppose the bishops and demand that they agree with him, Constantine submitted to their leadership and expertise, and the Council of Nicaea affirmed the doctrine of Jesus’ divinity.

    Later in life, Constantine continued to flirt with Arianism, even being baptized by an Arian bishop at the end of his life. After he passed, Constantine’s successors persecuted Athanasius over the issue of Jesus’ divinity, exiling him an astounding five times. However, the bishops remained firm, submitting to the Scriptures rather than the emperors, and today the doctrine of the Trinity and Jesus’ divinity is firmly established—without any influence from Constantine.

    Did Constantine Force Christians to Abandon the Biblical Calendar?

    After the destruction of the temple in 70 AD, the Jewish community changed how they determined the dates of Passover. For over 800 years, there were many competing methods for structuring the calendar, none of which were the system in place during the time of Jesus.

    During this time, the Christian community struggled to find consistent dates to celebrate the resurrection of Jesus (which they called Pascha, the Greek translation of the Hebrew Pesach, meaning Passover). Many churches relied on their Jewish neighbors for these dates, but this wasn’t ideal. For one, many Christians distrusted the synagogues, which had persecuted the Church for almost a hundred years, had forced the Christians out of their communities by declaring them heretics, and had taught that Jesus was a false sorcerer who had been sent to hell for His sins. Additionally, Passover in one synagogue might be as much as a month off from the synagogue in the next town, leading to churches from town to town celebrating at different times.

    For hundreds of years prior to Constantine’s reign, Christians debated the proper time to observe Passover. So when the Council of Nicaea was finally called to address the Arian heresy, the subject of the timing of Passover was also discussed.

    While a dating method was not determined, the bishops agreed that all Christians should celebrate on the same day and that this day should be calculated independent from the Jewish community.

    Later that century (and long after Constantine’s death), the Church finally agreed on a way to determine the date of Passover. Passover would always be celebrated after the first full moon that fell after the spring equinox—the same method that was in place during Jesus’ life, according to Jewish-Roman historian Josephus, Jewish scholar Philo, the translators of the Septuagint, and several other ancient Jewish teachers.[3]

    Constantine did not force the Church to change the calendar, nor did he dictate when Passover would be celebrated, though the Christians of the day agreed that the calendar needed to be corrected and eventually made that correction.[4]

    Did Constantine Enact Anti-Jewish Laws?

    Constantine did indeed enact what could be considered an anti-Jewish law. On October 18, 315, Constantine made it illegal for Jews to “attack with stones or any other kind of violence” fellow ethnic Jews who had converted to Christianity. According to the law, there had been recent instances of Jews committing violence against converts to Christianity, so Constantine outlawed this practice and made it punishable by “immediately being given over to the flames and burned” (Codex Theodosianus 16.8.1[5]).

    Constantine did enact several other laws related to the Jews as well. In addition to making Judaism a legal practice with the Edict of Milan in 313 AD, he also exempted Jewish leaders from compulsory military service (16.8.2) and public service (16.8.4); preserved the rights of Jews to serve on municipal councils (16.8.3); and prohibited recent Christian converts from “disturbing Jews or inflicting any injury on them” (16.8.5).

    Based on the historical record, Constantine did not actually enact any laws that could be interpreted as oppressive towards the Jewish people, other than preventing them from oppressing Christian converts—and even then, he also outlawed Christian converts from oppressing Jews as well. Additionally, he passed several laws that protected the Jewish clergy and preserved the roles of the Jewish people in civil society. If anything, it could be said that Constantine enacted laws that actually protected the Jewish people in the increasingly Christianized empire.

    Was Constantine a Good Person?

    The purpose of this article was not to comment on Constantine’s morality or to conclude whether he was a genuine Christian. The goal was simply to clarify the role that Constantine played in the development of Christianity.

    And from the historical record, Constantine did not directly influence Christianity as we know it today, nor did he subvert what Christianity was prior to his conversion. He simply got out of the way. He prevented the enemies of the Faith from persecuting God’s people and allowed Christians the freedom to practice their religion in peace.

    When Constantine held doctrinal views contrary to the Church, he submitted to their theology rather than demand they cave to his. And despite tensions that had flared between Christians and Jews for hundreds of years, he prohibited violence from either side, allowing both to serve in the empire so long as they did so in peace.

    The Faith that Christians practice today—what is sometimes called Nicene Christianity—is the same faith Jesus passed on to His disciples. It is Biblical Christianity, and no historian can reasonably claim that Constantine had a hand in creating it.


    [1] As an example, the so-called Gospel of Bartholomew (tells a story where Jesus pulled up the earth like a carpet and led the devil out on a leash in the presence of the disciples, who immediately died out of fright and had to be resurrected one at a time.

    [2] The Gospel of Thomas, for instance, makes disparaging claims about women, suggesting that they aren’t fully human.

    [3] As you can see, the correction of the calendar was based almost exclusively on Jewish writings. Whether ancient Jewish scholars (translators of the Septuagint), Jewish scholars of Jesus’ day (Philo), or a Jew-turned-Roman historian (Josephus), all testify that of the proper calendar dating method. Additionally, the Talmud (a compilation of oral Jewish tradition formalized shortly after the Council of Nicaea) affirms there were many varying methods for determining Passover, none of which matched the system in place during Jesus’ ministry or in place today.

    [4] While on the subject of Passover, Constantine also didn’t invent Christmas or Valentine’s Day. He did, however, make Sunday a civil day of rest in 321 AD, allowing Christians to continue the practice of Sunday worship (established in the Book of Acts) without interfering with their work.

    [5] Source: https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Constitutiones/CTh16.html.

    Pesach or Pascha: When Should Christians Celebrate the Passion of Jesus?

    Jesus was crucified during the feast of Passover around 30 AD and was raised to life three days later. Since then, faithful Christians have commemorated this historic event every year. But what is the proper date to celebrate this holiday?

    This was one of the many questions that early believers debated during the first three centuries of Christianity, with various factions of the religion celebrating on different days. Amidst disagreement as to which day was the correct day, in 325 AD the Roman Emperor Constantine gathered hundreds of bishops from around the world to settle this question (and several others) once and for all. By the end of the council, an official date for Pascha[1] (the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew Pesach, meaning “Passover”) was not set, but two determinations were made:

    1. All Christians should celebrate on the same day

    “It was determined by common consent that everyone, everywhere should celebrate it on one and the same day. For what can be more appropriate, or what more solemn, than that this feast from which we have received the hope of immortality, should be kept by all without variation, using the same order and a clear arrangement?”[2]

    • The date of Pascha should be determined independent of the Jewish community

    “It seemed very unworthy for us to keep this most sacred feast following the custom of the Jews… Since we have cast aside their way of calculating the date of the festival, we can ensure that future generations can celebrate this observance at the more accurate time which we have kept from the first day of the passion until the present time… Therefore have nothing in common with that most hostile people, the Jews. We have received another way from the Savior. In our holy religion we have set before us a course which is both valid and accurate.”[3]

    Nowadays the Jewish Passover and the Christian Easter generally coincide, except for three years[4] out of every nineteen-year cycle. As faithful Christians who want to honor Jesus on the correct day, should we celebrate during Jewish Passover or on Easter Sunday? Should we observe Jesus’ resurrection at the same time that the Jews observe the deliverance from Egypt, or were the Nicene bishops correct to separate themselves from the Jewish calculations?

    What the Bible Says

    Even before the crucifixion of Jesus, Passover was about more than the escape from Egyptian slavery. It seems that God placed many deliverances during this week-long festival. To name just a few,

    • Lot was delivered from Sodom and Gomorrah during Passover
    • Joshua entered the Promised Land during Passover
    • Daniel received the vision of the return from Babylonian captivity during Passover
    • Esther’s fast for the deliverance of the Jews from Haman occurred during Passover

    The original Passover had become the template for God’s great and ever-present salvation. In fact, Passover had become so synonymous with God’s deliverance that Jeremiah prophesied the Messiah’s eventual deliverance of mankind would mirror and yet outshine the original Passover (Jeremiah 16:14-16, 23:5-8).

    Given the history, symbolism, and importance of Passover, it’s no surprise that Jesus died on the cross during this feast. Just as Jesus had rescued the Israelites from slavery to Egypt during Passover (Jude 1:5), so too did He rescue humanity from slavery to sin and death during this feast.

    Throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, God repeatedly gave the date of the Passover as the fourteenth day of Abib­—the first month:

    In the first month, on the fourteenth day of the month at the evening, you shall eat unleavened bread…” (Exodus 12:18)

    The Feast of Unleavened Bread[5] you shall keep. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, as I commanded you, in the appointed time of the month of Abib; for in the month of Abib you came out from Egypt.” (Exodus 34:18)

    On the fourteenth day of the first month at twilight is the Lord’s Passover. And on the fifteenth day[6] of the same month is the Feast of Unleavened Bread to the Lord…” (Leviticus 23:5, 6)

    Observe the month of Abib, and keep the Passover to the Lord your God, for in the month of Abib the Lord your God brought you out of Egypt by night.” (Deuteronomy 16:1)

    Turning to the New Testament accounts, all four gospels record that Jesus’ crucifixion occurred during Passover:

    Now it was the Preparation Day of the Passover, and about the sixth hour. And [Pilate] said to the Jews, ‘Behold your King!’ …Then he delivered Him to [the chief priests] to be crucified. So they took Jesus and led Him away.” (John 19:14, 16[7])

    If the people of God are looking for the date on which they should celebrate the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus, the days during the weeklong celebration of Passover/Unleavened Bread would be the answer. 

    More specifically, Jesus’ death and burial would have taken place on the first Friday of the Passover week:

    Now when evening had come, because it was the Preparation Day, that is, the day before the Sabbath [the day before Saturday, i.e., Friday]… he laid Him in a tomb…” (Mark 15:42, 46)

    …while His glorious resurrection would have taken place during the first Sunday of Passover:

    Now on the first day of the week [Sunday] Mary Magdalene went to the tomb early, while it was still dark, and saw that the stone had been taken away from the tomb.” (John 20:1)

    Jesus was crucified before sunset on the 14th day of the first month (a Friday); He was in the tomb on the 15th day of the first month (a Saturday); and He rose from the dead shortly before sunrise on the 16th day of the first month (a Sunday).[8]

    What the Jews Do

    In determining the proper dates to recognize these historical events, one must examine when the Jewish community and Christian community celebrate these holidays—and how they arrived at those dates. Today, observant Jews enjoy a Passover meal at sundown, just after the fourteenth day ends and the fifteenth day begins, during what they consider the first month of the year—the month of Nisan. This appears accurate to the biblical commission, but when does their first month begin—and why do they call it Nisan rather than Abib?

    There is no exact history on when the first month of the biblical calendar was supposed to begin, but what is known is that the methodology for calculating the start of this month has changed several times throughout the history of the Jewish people. From the time that the Passover was given to Moses and the Israelites (1446 BC) until the time of the Babylonian captivity (586 BC), the first month was called Abib—Hebrew for “barley ripening.” It is unknown how the new year was determined during this period, but it is agreed that the first day of each month was announced upon the first observation of the crescent moon immediately following a new moon and that the first month began near the spring equinox.[9] Each year typically had twelve months, and every few years a thirteenth “leap month” was added to keep Passover from drifting too close to winter.[10]

    After the southern kingdom of Judah was conquered in 586 BC, Jews en masse were exiled to Babylon. Here they were introduced to the more sophisticated calendar of Babylonia, which was based not on agriculture but strictly on the movements of the sun and the moon. The exiled Jews quickly adopted the precise Babylonian methodology (and a new Babylonian name for the first month of the year—Nisan, meaning “beginning”) while living in a foreign land, and—upon their return to the Promised Land in 539 BC—continued determining their feasts based on astronomy.

    Using the Babylonian method to sort their calendar, the first day of the year (1 Nisan) would fall on the day after the new moon closest to the spring equinox, while Passover (14 Nisan) would always fall on the first full moon on or after the spring equinox.

    This rationale continued from the Babylonian captivity until well into the first century AD. In The Antiquities of the Jews, which was written in 93 AD, Josephus writes:

    But in the month of Xanthicus, which is by us called Nisan, and is the beginning of our year, on the fourteenth day of the Lunar month, when the sun is in Aries;[11] for on this month it was that we were delivered from bondage under the Egyptians: the law ordained that we should every year slay that sacrifice which I before told you we slew when we came out of Egypt; and which is called the Passover.” (The Antiquities of the Jews, 3.10.5)

    This system was not without its problems. Given that the first month could begin fourteen days before the spring equinox, adherence to this system required both an accurate observation of new moons as well as a foreknowledge of when the spring equinox would begin.[12] When the Sanhedrin was confident that the stars had aligned properly, they would announce the new year and the people could begin preparing for the upcoming Passover.[13]

    After the destruction of the second temple in 70 AD, the determination for the Hebrew new year—and thus the proper dating for the Passover—became fractured within the Jewish community, with various groups using different standards and thus celebrating on different days. For instance, Rabbi Jose ben Halafta suggested the following criteria for establishing a new year:

    A year may be intercalated on three grounds: for the ripening of the grain, for the fruit of the trees, and for the equinox. Any two of these can justify intercalation, but not one alone.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 11b)

    Rabbi Shimeon ben Gamaliel offered a different view, suggesting that the month of Nisan should be pushed back thirty days if “the pigeons are still tender and the spring lambs thin” (Sanhedrin 11a). Rabbi Judah ha-Nasi said the new year should be delayed a month if the spring equinox is over twenty days away, while others suggested it should be delayed if the equinox is only sixteen days (Mishnah Sanhedrin 12b). There was also disagreement concerning whether a leap month could be added to adjust the timing of Sukkot,[14] as well as whether leap months could be used during successive years or during sabbath years.

    Without an objective, universal standard, the Sanhedrin would end up deciding when the new year had begun based on some combination of the above rationales, and these often varied from year to year. Those abroad had no way to know when the new year would begin, which led to scattered communities either waiting for messengers to arrive with the message that Nisan had officially been declared or celebrating Passover on the day they figured it would most likely fall on. This disparate methodology continued for almost a thousand years, with historical records revealing many distinct dates and competing calculations for Passover throughout the first millennium AD, even in the same year.

    According to a tenth century tradition, Hillel the Nasi[15] proposed a fixed nineteen-year calendar in the year 359 AD.[16] However, this idea didn’t gain widespread attention until the ninth century. Sometime after 836 AD, the Jewish community began using a repeating nineteen-year cycle to determine the beginning of the month of Nisan. Adjustments were made over the next ninety years, and around 924 AD this new calendar system reached its modern form by applying the nineteen-year cycle to the Julian Calendar. This system is still in use by the Jewish community today.

    Since the modern Hebrew calendar is based on a fixed timeline and not the actual movements of the sun, it is slightly out-of-sync with the solar year. As a result, the Hebrew calendar drifts by approximately two hours every nineteen years, which has led to a roughly five-day shift since its inception in the tenth century. Eventually this discrepancy will push Passover into summer, Sukkot into winter, and Hanukkah into spring. Jewish scholars have suggested that this shift will need to be rectified eventually, but currently there are no plans to adjust the calendar.

    What the Christians Do

    After the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus occurred during the Passover festival, followers of Jesus continued celebrating the Passover in the context of this momentous event. Evidence in the Book of Acts demonstrates that the apostle Paul and his ministry team observed Passover while living in gentile Philippi (Acts 20:6), and Paul explicitly connects Jesus’ passion to the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread (1 Corinthians 5:7).

    While there was general agreement among Christians that the crucifixion and resurrection should be celebrated during the month of Nisan, disagreement arose concerning on which day of the month it should be observed. Bishops in the East, led by Polycrates of Ephesus, “held that the fourteenth day of the moon, on which day the Jews were commanded to sacrifice the lamb, should be observed as the feast of the Savior’s Passover.”[17] In a 195 AD letter, Polycrates cited half a dozen Christians throughout history, including the apostle John and Polycarp of Smyrna, who also observed the crucifixion on the fourteenth day of Nisan.

    On the other hand, bishops in the west, led by the Roman African Bishop Victor I, contended that the resurrection should always be celebrated on a Sunday—albeit the Sunday during the weeklong Feast of Unleavened Bread. This necessitated that the crucifixion be observed on a Friday during Passover, which wouldn’t always fall on the fourteenth.

    Though much ink and several synods were convened, no decision was reached. All parties involved agreed to live peaceably despite the difference and their various congregations continued observing these holidays between 14 Nisan and 22 Nisan.

    This tacit arrangement continued for the next century and a half, but dissatisfaction arose concerning the method of deciding when Nisan had officially begun. During this time the Jewish people lacked a consistent technique for determining the new year. As such, Christian churches depended on an announcement from their local Jewish community. And depending on where you lived, the date you received from the Jews in your region might differ by as much as thirty days from the date celebrated a few towns away.

    There was also a general acknowledgement that the dates provided by the Jews, inconsistent or not, were based on a relative system foreign to the calculations of old. Anatolius of Laodicea wrote in 260 AD that the Jews, whose newer system could place the Passover before the spring equinox, had “committed no slight or common blunder” in abandoning the calendar system used from the sixth century BC until the destruction of the second temple. He continued,

    And this is not an opinion of our own, but it was known to the Jews of old, even before Christ, and was carefully observed by them.”

    Looking back into Jewish history, he cited Philo, Josephus, Musaeus, “and not only them, but also those yet more ancient, the two Agathobuli, surnamed ‘masters,’ and the famous Aristobulus, who was chosen among the seventy interpreters of the sacred and divine Hebrew Scriptures” as those who used the older system:

    These writers, explaining questions in regard to the Exodus, say that all alike should sacrifice the Passover offerings after the spring equinox, in the middle of the first month.”[18]

    The growing sentiment was that—since the Jewish community had abandoned the calendar which was in place during the latter years of the Hebrew Scriptures, during the life and ministry of Jesus, and during the early church—it didn’t make sense to rely on their inconsistent and constantly evolving guidance in determining the official dates of Passover.

    Disagreement continued for another sixty years, until, amid growing confusion, Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea to address this topic (along with the Arian heresy). At the council, bishops from around the world argued for a variety of possible solutions. Some wanted to rely on the Jewish calendar, while others wanted to break away and return to the ancient and thus “correct” system for dating Nisan. Some felt the observance should always occur on Sunday, while others felt it should always occur on the 14th day of the lunar month.

    At the conclusion of the Nicene Council, the bishops had formally resolved the issue. While no formal calculation was established, it was agreed that Pascha would be determined independently from the Jews. Within a century, the Church widely adopted a calendar system based on the methodology that had been in place during the life of Jesus[19]: the fourteenth of Nisan would fall on the first full moon on or after the spring equinox, and Pascha in turn would be celebrated on the following Sunday.[20] The consensus was that this calculation wasn’t new but instead was that “which we have kept from the first day of the passion,” and by returning to this tradition they had “set before us a course which is both valid and accurate.”[21]

    Differences Between the Calendars

    Today both the Christians and the Jews use a nineteen-year calendar first developed by Anatolius. While the calendars mostly align, the Jewish calendar places Jewish Passover a month after Christian Easter three times every nineteen-year cycle. This is because the Christian calculation is based on the spring equinox while the Jewish calculation is fixed to the now defunct Julian calendar. As a result, the dates for Jewish Passover are slowing shifting toward summer. Unless Jewish calendar is updated, more and more dates on the nineteen-year cycle will shift further from the spring equinox over the coming centuries.[22]

    Which System Should Christians Use Today?

    The proper date to observe Pascha is during the week of Passover/Unleavened Bread, from 14 Nisan to 22 Nisan. Both the Jews and the Christians agree on this but disagree on when the month of Nisan begins. And throughout history, the standard for calculating the month of Nisan has changed many times, with (according to many scholars) a seemingly foreign system adopted from Babylon even being used during the ministry of Jesus (not to mention replacing the Hebrew name of the month with the Babylonian name).

    As the Jews and Christians each believe they are celebrating during the correct month of Nisan and the Bible doesn’t define when Nisan should begin, it could be argued that both are striving for the spirit of the law and thus neither are provably in error.

    However, while neither system can be condemned, it is my opinion that the current Christian system is more faithful than the others, for the following three reasons:

    First, it was the system in place during the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. According to a plethora of Jewish sources, Jesus would have celebrated Passover during the first full moon on or after the spring equinox. He would have eaten His last supper and died upon the cross during the Nisan based on this system. And He would have been raised from the dead on the Sunday following the fourteenth of this Nisan. Additionally, Peter, Paul, and the rest of the early church would have observed the feast using this system.

    Secondly, third century Christians had the authority to break from the Jews and adopt this system. As has been mentioned, the Jews changed their calendar on multiple occasions. In fact, several of these changes occurred after they had rejected the Messiah, rendering their religious service unfaithful to the Torah. If the Jesus-denying Jewish community had the authority to break from the past and update their calendar, how much more would a Church submitted to Christ have the authority to break from the present and return to the ways of old?

    Finally, the Christian system is based on the motions of the sun while the Jewish system is based on a defunct Roman calendar. While the Christian system was established within the context of the Roman Empire, it doesn’t actually place the celebration of Pascha within the confines of a Roman calendar; it instead uses the spring equinox and the phases of the moon. The Jewish calendar, on the other hand, uses a Roman calendar established by Julius Caesar rather than the equinox. And given the slight inaccuracy of the Julian calendar, the Jewish system will have to eventually be changed yet again.

    For these reasons, it is my belief that the Christian Pascha is the more accurate date to celebrate Christ our Passover. However, Jesus isn’t only the Lamb of God on the fourteenth of Nisan, nor is He only alive on Sundays.

    I am He who lives, and was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore.” (Revelation 1:18)

    As believers in the Messiah, we should remember His broken body and His shed blood whenever we gather together, and we should rejoice in the power of His resurrection at all times. The most proper day to observe the Passover Lamb is every day, and he who recognizes the Lordship of Christ shall not be condemned, whether he recognizes it using my preferred Paschal system or not.


    [1] Pascha is the common and historical name for Easter. To this day, most languages refer to the celebration of Jesus’ resurrection as some form of Pascha (Spanish: Pascua, French: Pâques, Dutch: Pasen, Filipino: Pasko, Hawaiian: Pakoa, Turkish: Paskalya, Swahili: Pasaka, and so on); while a handful of languages (like English, German, and Japanese) use some variant of the word Easter. The first recorded use of the word Easter was in 725, when the Venerable Bede wrote that “Eosturmonath [the month of Easter] has a name now translated ‘Paschal month,’ and which was once called after a goddess of theirs named Eostre” (The Reckoning of Time, Chapter 15: The English Months). Ironically, he was commenting how Pascha took place during the English month of Eostre (an old English deity unknown to history except for Bede’s passing reference), but his pointing this out caused the English people to adopt the name Easter for the holiday season.

    [2] Source: Vita Constantini, Book III.17-20 (Eusebius).

    [3] Source: ibid.

    [4] While the dates currently vary three times every nineteen years, this discrepancy will grow as time goes on (albeit slowly). By the year 3000, for instance, there will be six discrepancies every nineteen years.

    [5] “Passover” originally referred to the sacrificial lamb that was slain on the afternoon of the fourteenth day of the first month. This was followed by the Feast of Unleavened Bread, which began that evening and lasted seven days. Over time, the term “Passover” began to describe the meal eaten on the first night of Unleavened Bread (i.e., the Passover Seder), and nowadays it’s not uncommon for the entire weeklong festival to be called Passover.

    [6] Because Genesis 1 recounts each day with the words “so the evening and the morning were the [first/second/etc.] day,” the traditional Biblical calendar day begins at sunset rather than at midnight. Thus, “the fifteenth day” began at sundown a few hours after the Passover sacrifice of the fourteenth day, not twenty-four hours later.

    [7] Similar accounts are recorded in Matthew 26, Mark 14, Luke 22, and 1 Corinthians 5.

    [8] It should be noted that, while scripture seems to indicate these were the calendar dates and weekdays of these events, there is scholarly debate as to which exact weekday and which calendar date during the weeklong festival all of these things happened. Regardless, there is universal agreement that these events took place during the Paschal season.

    [9] Most scholars believe that, before the Babylonian exile, Israelites used agricultural observation rather than astronomical observance to determine when the spring equinox would occur. However, as there are no records indicating their methodology during this time, this is educated speculation.

    [10] A lunar month is about 29.5 days long, meaning a twelve-month lunar year is about 354. This is a little over eleven days short of a solar year (~365.2425 days), so leap months are occasionally added to make up for this eleven-day drift into winter.

    [11] That is, after the spring equinox.

    [12] It is recorded that when a Jew saw the first slivers of a crescent moon, he was to report it immediately to the Sanhedrin. This witness would then select the shape and rotation of the crescent moon from a lineup of several possible choices to confirm that the shape they claimed to have seen matched the shape predicted during that time of year. Only when two witnesses had been confirmed to have seen the correct moon phase would the Sanhedrin officially declare that the new month had begun.

    [13] A comical historical detail reveals that when the Sanhedrin observed a new moon, they would light signal fires to inform the nation of the change in month. The Samaritans, always a thorn in the side of the Jews, interrupted this practice by lighting fake signal fires to throw off the celebration of Biblical feasts. To ward against this, the Jews began sending messengers rather than relying on signal fires. However, this method took much longer, resulting in far-off communities missing feasts by a day or so. To be safe, Jewish communities outside of Israel would estimate the true day of the feast and begin the celebration both a day early and the next day—to ensure the feast was celebrated on the correct day. This is why modern Jewish families living in the diaspora observe feasts for two days, while those in Israel only observe for one day.

    [14] Sukkot, or the Feast of Tabernacles, is an eight-day fall festival celebrated during the seventh month of the Biblical calendar.

    [15] Nasi means “prince” in Hebrew, revealing Hillel II was a leader of the Sanhedrin during the fourth century.

    [16] The fixed nineteen-year lunar calendar was first proposed by Christian bishop Anatolius of Laodicea almost a hundred years earlier.

    [17] Source: Church History, Book V.23.1 (Eusebius).

    [18] Source: Church History, Book VII.32.15-17 (Eusebius).

    [19] Anatolius proposed this system in 260 AD, and in addition to being formally adopted by the Church a century later, six hundred years later it also became the basis for the Jewish calendar in use today.

    [20] Not all Christian churches use this system today. The Orthodox Church, for instance, adds an additional rule to the above criteria: it must occur after Jewish Passover.

    [21] Source: Vita Constantini, Book III.17-20 (Eusebius).

    [22] Ironically, the impetus for the Christians breaking from the Jewish calendar was because the system of the third century placed too many Passovers before the spring equinox. The Jews’ current system—put in place during the tenth century—now places too many Passovers over a month after the spring equinox.

    How Jesus Fulfilled Shavuot

    (Originally posted June 3, 2022)

    Tomorrow night is the start of Pentecost/Shavuot. As you may recall, the celebration of Shavuot takes place in the opening chapters of Acts, where the Holy Spirit is poured out on all believers. With that in mind, take a look at a few details that Luke chooses to include in Acts 1:

    – Jesus was taken up from a mountain after He had given commandments

    – He was with the disciples for an additional forty days

    – Jesus was taken up in a cloud to sit with God

    And wouldn’t you know, all of these details also appear in the story of the Ten Commandments (Exodus 19, 20, 24), which is the basis for Shavuot:

    – Moses comes down from a mountain to give Israel the commandments

    – Moses spent forty days on the mountain with God

    – When Moses ascends the mountain, he is covered by a cloud

    Jesus’ actions (such as waiting forty days) and Luke’s authorship (such as mentioning Jesus’ giving of the commandments) are meant to scream to us, “SHAVOUT! SHAVUOT! SHAVUOT!” We’re being primed to think of Jesus as a new and better Moses, and any reader familiar with the Hebrew Scriptures would be thinking of Exodus, Moses, and Pentecost as they read through Acts 1.

    Well, what happened during that first Shavuot at Mount Sinai? As God’s people gathered together at the foot of the mountain, there was crashing thunder and loud trumpets. Thick storm clouds rushed through the people. God descended from heaven in a raging fire.

    And what happens in Acts 2, as the disciples celebrated Shavuot? As God’s people gathered together in Jerusalem, there were loud sounds from heaven. A rushing, mighty wind blew through their midst. Flames of fire appeared over each of the disciples’ heads as God descended upon them.

    Jesus is thus the new Moses. He has delivered us from the bondage of sin, written the Word of God upon the tablets of our hearts, and commanded us to reclaim the earth for His Kingdom.

    * * * * *

    “I will raise up for them a Prophet like Moses from among their brethren, and will put My words in His mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him.” (Deuteronomy 18:18)

    Jonah and the Feast of Tabernacles

    The Feast of Tabernacles is a time to celebrate God’s choice to dwell among His people and our complete dependence on Him. We are commanded to rejoice and feast with others: family and friends, the fortunate and the less-fortunate, believers and non-believers.

    With that in mind, there is a small detail in the story of Jonah that many of us have probably missed. After Jonah preaches to the Ninevites, after the Ninevites repent, and after God forgives their sin and turns away their deserved destruction, Jonah leaves the city, sits on a hillside, and builds himself a small tabernacle to shelter himself from the sun.

    But although he is dwelling in a tabernacle, he is embodying the opposite attitude of the Feast of Tabernacles. Rather than welcoming non-Jews into God’s family, he is angry that they have been forgiven. Rather than rejoicing, he is “displeased exceedingly,” “angry,” and “distressed” (literally, evil). Rather than depending on God, he is yet again trying to escape from God. Essentially, Jonah has a little pity-party on that hillside, a voluntary Anti-Tabernacles, during a time when he should have been rejoicing.

    This week is a time for rejoicing. It is a time for celebrating God’s faithfulness and God’s blessings. It is a time for compassionately welcoming those who don’t yet know the truth. It is a time for trusting in God rather than the world around us.

    Don’t be Jonah. Don’t choose to be angry and bitter. Don’t look for reasons to be upset. Don’t decide to hate those with different (even wrong) views. Choose to rejoice, to welcome, to celebrate, to feast.

    “Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice!” (Philippians 4:4)

    Why We Read Ecclesiastes During the Feast of Tabernacles

    God commanded His people to keep the Feast of Tabernacles “because the Lord your God will bless you in all your increase and in all the work of your hands, so that you surely will rejoice.” It’s a weeklong festival celebrating the ever-abiding presence of God with us, and the health, prosperity, and joy that comes from the Lord.

    So why do we read Ecclesiastes on this celebration? Ecclesiastes is a sermon from a man (“the Preacher”) who got everything he ever wanted. He grew as wise and intelligent as anyone could’ve hoped to become. He acquired more wealth than anyone who had ever lived before. He found great success in all his ventures, and his fame spread far and wide.

    He had everything he could’ve wanted, everything any of us could want. He got all the things that the Feast of Tabernacles says we can have. But he got it the wrong way. Rather than sticking with God and being blessed by Him, the Preacher turned from God and tried to get it all apart from Him.

    And he succeeded. He got it all. Fame, wealth, women, success. But without God, it all meant nothing. There was no purpose, no pleasure, no joy. It was, as the Preacher put it, “vanity of vanities.” He finishes his sermon by saying, “Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep His commandments, for this is man’s all.”

    As we enter this week of celebration, let’s not focus on the stuff. Let’s not focus on our own pleasure and desires. Instead let’s focus on the God who gives us richly all things to enjoy, the God who provides our every need and heals our mortal bodies, the God who is more than enough.

    “Give thanks to the Lord, for He is good, and His mercy endures forever.”

    How to Ring in the New Year on Rosh Hashanah

    Rosh Hashanah (Hebrew for “Head of the Year”) is the Jewish New Year, which, as you would expect, takes place on the first day of the… seventh month… of the year (don’t ask). Rosh Hashanah (referred to in the Bible as Yom Teruah, or “Day of Blasting”) is traditionally the date of the creation of Adam and Eve, and is a day of celebration but also of reflecting on the sins and shortcomings of the last year as we usher in the new year of blessings and prosperity.

    How To Do It

    There are a number of traditions on Rosh Hashanah. Feel free to review them and then practice a few or all of them. Our family typically throws a Rosh Hashanah party with dozens of families, but you might feel more comfortable starting off with your family and a few close friends.

    Holiday Greeting

    On Rosh Hashanah, we greet teach other by saying, “Shanah tovah!” which means, “Have a good year!” Make sure to greet your family and friends with this greeting on Rosh Hashanah.

    Reflection and Repentance

    An important aspect of Rosh Hashanah is reflecting on the past year. For all of us, there are things that didn’t go how we had hoped, or maybe we made mistakes or didn’t live the way we had hoped. Micah says,

    “Who is like You, O God, who pardons our sins and forgives our transgressions… You will again have compassion on us and will trample out sins under your feet and hurl our iniquities into the depths of the sea.” (Micah 7:18, 19)

    As such, take time to look back and repent of any sins or shortcomings from the last year. Then take a piece of bread—representing our sins—and cast them into a body of water. A lake, river, or ocean is a great place if available; if you don’t live close to a water source, we’ve been known to fill up a kid pool in the backyard and use that.

    Be sure to explain to your kids/guests why you’re throwing a piece of bread into a lake. Give them a minute or two to consider the previous year and make a commitment to overcome in the coming year.

    The Meal

    Begin the meal by having the women and girls light the candles while reciting the traditional blessing,

    “Blessed are You, Lord our God, King of the Universe, who has sanctified us by His Word, and commanded us to light the holiday candles.”

    As your family is ushering a sweet new year, you should prepare a sweet meal. Apples dipped in honey, round challah bread, sweet potatoes, beats, dates, raisins, and pomegranates should be served as sides/appetizers. Since this is the “head of the year,” it is customary to serve a fish head, reminding guests that this next year they will be the head and not the tail (Deuteronomy 28:13). Of course, you don’t have to consume the head. For a main dish, you can prepare something fish-based or a chicken. Dessert can follow in the fruit theme with a berry pie. 

    Blow the Shofar in Memorial of Kingships

    One of the biblical mandates for Rosh Hashanah reads,

    “In the seventh month, on the first day of the month, you shall have a sabbath-rest, a memorial of blowing of trumpets, a holy convocation.” (Leviticus 23:24)

    As such, it is customary to blow the shofar during Rosh Hashanah. When asked why we blow the shofar, one answer the Talmud gives is that we do it “in remembrance of kingships.” Part of celebrating the new year is every one of us acknowledging that God is our King and the King of the Universe, and just as we cast off the sins of last year, we also make a commitment to live for God our King this coming year.

    But notice that “kings” is plural. We aren’t simply celebrating that God is God. We are celebrating that God has created each and every one of us to rule and reign as kings on earth (Genesis 1:28, Exodus 19:6, Romans 5:17, 1 Peter 2:9, Revelation 1:6). So as we blow the shofar, we make a commitment to serve Jesus Christ our King and rejoice that we get to reign in life with Him.

    Once you explain why we sound the trumpet, pull out your shofar are give it one long blast, three medium blasts, nine short blasts, and finally one really, really long blast.

    Readings

    On the first night of Rosh Hashanah, read Genesis 21:1-34—the birth of Isaac—with your family. The next night, it is customary to read Genesis 22:1-24—the binding of Isaac. You can also read Genesis 1 with your family, as Rosh Hashanah is traditionally when God created Adam and Eve—the original royal priesthood of the earth.

    How Hebrew Poetry Accents Scripture: A Reflection on Lamentations during Tisha B’av

    Tomorrow night is the start of Tisha B’av—the observance of when the first and second temple were destroyed (586 BC by Babylon and 70 AD by Rome). Traditionally on Tisha B’av, the book of Lamentations is read, which consists of a five-chapter dirge over the destruction of Jerusalem. If you haven’t read it recently, I encourage you to check it out this weekend.

    The first chapter of Lamentations consists of 22 triplets that follow a qinah meter. As the Hebrew alphabet has 22 verses, each triplet begins with the subsequent letter of the alphabet, making the first chapter an acrostic poem. The second chapter follows these patterns as well.

    Well, almost.

    If you look closely, there are a few cracks beneath the surface of these poetic flourishes. The acrostic is not quite right. The letter pe (17th letter) comes before the ayin (16th letter). Additionally, the qinah meter, while almost universal, is missing from a few verses. The poetry looks great to the untrained eye, but it’s slowly falling apart underneath.

    The third chapter continues the (almost) pattern of acrostic and qinah meter, even leveling it up a bit. Not only does each triplet begin with the next Hebrew letter—each line of each triplet begins with the next Hebrew letter as well. It’s no surprise that, as the poetry seems to improve, the subject changes from merely lamenting the destruction of Jerusalem to calls for repentance and a renewed hope that God will deliver them from their troubles. But while they seem to be getting things in order, the flaws in the poetry remain.

    The improved poetry is short-lived. In chapter 4, rather than acrostic triplets, there is a noticeable downgrade to couplets. The mismatched acrostic and missing qinah meters remain present. Just like Jerusalem, the poetry is falling apart fast.

    We finally arrive at chapter 5. As you would expect, this chapter has 22 verses. But there isn’t even an attempt to form an acrostic. There are no couplets or triplets. There’s no qinah meter. All attempts at poetic flare are abandoned, just as Jerusalem had been abandoned. As Jeremiah laments, “The young men [have ceased] from their song” (Lamentations 5:14).

    As we look back on the destruction of the City of God this weekend, let’s reflect on the state of our own “city upon a hill.” Are we living out God’s commission towards peace and justice? Or have we moved our souls far from peace and forgotten God’s goodness (Lamentations 3:17)?

    It’s not too late to turn things around.

    “Let us search out and examine our ways,

    And turn back to the LORD.

    Let us lift our hearts and hands

    To God in heaven.” (Lamentations 3:40, 41)